"Despite all this, we will continue to campaign for free expression globally — not just because it’s a key tenet of free societies, but also because more information generally means more choice, more power, more economic opportunity and more freedom for people."
The search engine giant also argued that it was not responsible for the content of videos posted on its site, while pressured that it would follow its guidelines and the legislation of each country.
"If a video is illegal in a particular country, we will restrict access to it, after receiving a valid court order or government complaint," Coelho said.
"Because we are deeply committed to free expression, we often push back on requests that we do not believe are valid."
In an another development, a US federal judge has ordered arrest of a Californian man connected to an anti-Islam film posted Google’s YouTube and accused that he breached terms of his trial on a bank fraud conviction.
Google’s executive chairman Eric Schmidt defended hosting of an anti-Islam film at its video sharing site YouTube that sparked violent protests across Muslim countries saying the answer to "bad speech is more speech" — not a ban.
This article is from the CBROnline archive: some formatting and images may not be present.
Join Our Newsletter
Want more on technology leadership?
Sign up for Tech Monitor's weekly newsletter, Changelog, for the latest insight and analysis delivered straight to your inbox.