View all newsletters
Receive our newsletter - data, insights and analysis delivered to you
  1. Technology
  2. Software
August 12, 2013

Apple faces tough limits in ebooks case

Apple has been found guilty of collaborating with major publishers to fix ebook prices.

By CBR Staff Writer

A US district judge is considering imposing tough limits on Apple for illegally collaborating with publishers to increase and fix the prices of ebooks.

Judge Denise Cote is deciding whether to prevent Apple for five years from signing deals with publishers which allow the iPad maker to reduce ebook prices.

"My focus is on making sure we don’t have collusive illegal activity again interfering with the ebooks market," Cote said.

However, Cote also said that she may not force Apple to use a court-appointed external monitor.

Last month she found Apple guilty of collaborating with major publishers to fix the prices of ebooks, creating unfair competition for other retailers.

As per the DOJ’s proposal, Apple would also have to appoint a permanent internal antitrust compliance officer for the next 10 years.

 

Content from our partners
Scan and deliver
GenAI cybersecurity: "A super-human analyst, with a brain the size of a planet."
Cloud, AI, and cyber security – highlights from DTX Manchester

 

Websites in our network
Select and enter your corporate email address Tech Monitor's research, insight and analysis examines the frontiers of digital transformation to help tech leaders navigate the future. Our Changelog newsletter delivers our best work to your inbox every week.
  • CIO
  • CTO
  • CISO
  • CSO
  • CFO
  • CDO
  • CEO
  • Architect Founder
  • MD
  • Director
  • Manager
  • Other
Visit our privacy policy for more information about our services, how Progressive Media Investments may use, process and share your personal data, including information on your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications. Our services are intended for corporate subscribers and you warrant that the email address submitted is your corporate email address.
THANK YOU