In one short year, Novell has gone from being one of the biggest victims of the Linux and open source movements to what will turn out to be one of its biggest and most ardent champions, and yesterday, Messman laid out the case for open source and its inevitability in his address.
The challenges that Novell and the entire software industry faces when embracing or confronting open source are in many respects the same ones that corporations considering the adoption of open source technologies are staring down, said Messman.
Novell, he explained, is a company that was founded in the 1980s on the idea of creating and selling proprietary software. Both vendors and customers want control – vendors have wanted intellectual property and account control, customers want to pick their platforms and control what software comes into their shops.
The open source model is an anathema to this whole idea. Open source, he said, means collaborative, collective programming, increasing speed to market, and picking from a wide variety of software solution providers. This is something that would seem to be an unfriendly world to a proprietary software maker like Novell has been for two decades.
Messman, addressing the Linux faithful, spent a lot of time today demonstrating and professing his faith in the open source model, something that the top brass at IBM and Hewlett-Packard have done in past LinuxWorld keynotes.
We are placing a big bet on open source, he said. We will not seek to change the open source model – we will embrace it. We in the community live and breathe it. But there are those in the industry, he said, referring to either The SCO Group or Microsoft or both, that want to muddy the waters.
At the end of his presentation, Messman stressed how Novell was now a citizen of the open source community and was fully committed to this movement, no matter how disruptive it is to the business models of established proprietary software players.
Novell will contribute more to open source than it takes away, he said, saying that the company would fill in gaps where it found them, particularly in fostering a desktop Linux environment that can compete with Windows and Unix desktops. We will not mess this up, he declared. Ximian and SuSE will not let us.
Novell acquired Ximian, an expert in Linux desktop GUIs and other Linux systems programs, in August 2003 for an undisclosed amount; in November 2003, Novell paid $210m in cash to buy SuSE, which is the number two commercial Linux distributor in the world and number one in a few markets.
He said that the 5,700 programmers at Novell have long since been infected with the open source mojo of the several dozen programmers from Ximian, and presumably the influx of people from SuSE will increase that mojo factor. But Novell, he said, is still adjusting to the realities of programming in open source mode.
It is a big change from writing code with your friends down the hall to doing it with hundreds of people around the world, he explained, adding that Novell had a bad case of not invented here syndrome. Open source might mean making less money per product or shifting from product sales to support services, but it increases the opportunities to deliver flexible solutions that span a large installed base of customers. It is not only possible, but profitable, to build a business on open source.
As for the immediate future of Linux, Messman said that 2004 would be the year that Linux goes mainstream on the enterprise servers, and that shortly after that, it would begin to go mainstream on desktops. One of the big levers for Linux sales on both servers and desktops is going to be TCO.
Messman cited TCO numbers that claim Linux can offer up to 80% lower ownership costs compared to Unix and that show Linux is about half the cost of Windows. He took a swipe at the latest TCO studies that show Windows is less costly than Linux, which Microsoft has been citing in its latest advertising campaigns. There have been studies that show different numbers, he said. But those studies have been funded by a special interest, and I will leave it at that.
The uptake of Linux on servers has been, he said, by and large confined to infrastructure workloads, but in 2004, Messman said he expected an increasing number of big customers deploying Linux running real mission-critical applications, not just edge print, file, and Web serving. How many customers and how much money this might generate is, quite frankly, anybody’s guess, and whatever prospects Novell has in terms of generating money and profits from Linux, Messman kept the numbers to himself.
But clearly there are numbers, and for the naysayers that claim it is hard to make money from open source products that a company does not own, he counters that this is just not the case.
Red Hat and SuSE show that people will pay for ‘free’ software, he said. He explained that enterprises do not like change in their IT environments, but that open source software is continually changing and is at odds with this philosophy. Novell has correctly seen that a vendor that manages and packages that change and provides stable versions of open source products will give comfort to enterprises – and they will pay for that service. CIOs want support from someone they can trust. One call, one throat to choke. That’s all.
Since different pieces of the open source software stack are developed and supported by different organizations, this presents something of a challenge to any Linux services company, whether it is Novell, IBM, HP, or Red Hat issue. The desktops we are all talking about are the same ones that HP CEO and chairman Carly Fiorina said that the Linux community should not chase in her LinuxWorld keynote a year ago. Several times in its history, Novell has tried to take on Microsoft, the desktop software juggernaut that has over 90% of the installed desktops and laptops in the world and now a dominant force in servers, and it has by and large failed.
The acquisitions of WordPerfect, DR-DOS, and Unix System V were in one way or another all about taking on Microsoft on the desktop and in the server room. Messman said that Linux on the desktop is gaining traction, particularly in governments outside of the US. As a company, we can barely keep up with RFPs and RPQs in this area, said Messman.
The adoption of Linux in Europe and Asia on the desktop can, in some sense, be thought of as an early indicator of what could happen on desktops in the States. Similarly, Unix took off in Europe well ahead of the its adoption in the US in the early 1990s, even thought the dominant Unix players at the time were located in the States. The issue then had less to do with whether or not a vendor was indigenous to a local country than whether or not they supported the ideals of open systems.
This article is based on material originally published by ComputerWire
