US District Judge Terry Hatter has thought better of his ruling that Ashton-Tate Corp is not entitled to claim copyright on its dBase database products. Ashton had filed a motion for reconsideration of Hatter’s order in December; the judge originally denied the motion, but last week amended his order and rescinded the previous ruling. The decision came in Ashton-Tate’s suit against Fox Software Inc of November 1988 alleging that FoxBase+ and FoxPro infringe dBase copyrights. Hatter originally ruled the copyright invalid on grounds that Ashton had not disclosed prior art, but the US Register of Copyrights independently filed a declaration supporting Ashton-Tate’s position and saying the company had followed the proper copyright registration procedure. The new ruling does not affirm or deny the copyright and the Fox suit proceeds.
Content from our partners
