View all newsletters
Receive our newsletter - data, insights and analysis delivered to you
  1. Technology
May 19, 1997updated 05 Sep 2016 1:08pm


By CBR Staff Writer

The can of alphabet soup that is the committees fighting to gain control of the internet’s top-level domain (TLD) name structure just got a little fuller. The Internet Ad-Hoc Committee (IAHC) has been disbanded and in its place comes an interim Policy Oversight Committee (iPOC), made up largely of the same people and organizations initially, but with new members being brought on board shortly. Talk of iPOC first appeared on various mailing lists earlier this week, causing a few raised virtual eyebrows. Its purpose is to transition to a Policy Oversight Committee (POC) that will oversee the Council of Registrars (CORE) that the old IAHC proposed in its recent Geneva memorandum of understanding, which has now been signed by 104 companies endorsing the plan. And the full POC cannot be convened until the registrars have been selected, which is due to happen some time this summer. The process for choosing the companies that will register the seven new domain names the IAHC proposed is up in the air right now. A lottery was abandoned by the IAHC last week, in favor of a free-for-all, with the new registrars only having to meet minimum financial and technical standards set out in the MoU. CORE would manage the share databases – one for each of the seven domains – and users would go to CORE registers their TLDs, as they do currently with the InterNIC. That is managed currently by just one company, Network Solutions Inc (NSI), which was awarded the contract for .com, .org and .net by the federal National Science Foundation (NSF), which expires next spring. Dave Crocker, IAHC member and director of the Internet Mail Consortium said the registering process should be completed by late Q3, early Q4. David Maher, a current IAHC member and a registered patent attorney in the Chicago law firm Sonnenschein Nath & Rosenthal, has been appointed chair of iPOC. He will oversee the tasks of creating the legal documents for the operation of CORE and sorting out the technical problems of allowing shared databases for the seven new TLDs. There is no ‘official’ process with this TLD process however. NSI is reluctant to give up its hold on .com, .org and .net, and there are numerous other companies offering registering services for TLDs other than those mentioned here, it’s just a question of whether the domain name servers will recognize them or not, and that’s at the whim of the companies and universities that own and operate the servers. There are also many objectors to the MoU, complaining that’s it’s unnecessarily bureaucratic – and we can see why they say that – and that registering names should be left to the free market, NSI among them, although we doubt NSI would incliude its three TLDs in this ‘free’ market. Existing IAHC members in iPOC will peel away and be replaced by members picked by bodies including the International Telecommunications Union (ITU), International Trademark Association (INTA), Internet Society (ISOC), Internet Assign Numbers Authority (IANA) and CORE itself, among others.

Content from our partners
Green for go: Transforming trade in the UK
Manufacturers are switching to personalised customer experience amid fierce competition
How many ends in end-to-end service orchestration?

Websites in our network
Select and enter your corporate email address Tech Monitor's research, insight and analysis examines the frontiers of digital transformation to help tech leaders navigate the future. Our Changelog newsletter delivers our best work to your inbox every week.
  • CIO
  • CTO
  • CISO
  • CSO
  • CFO
  • CDO
  • CEO
  • Architect Founder
  • MD
  • Director
  • Manager
  • Other
Visit our privacy policy for more information about our services, how New Statesman Media Group may use, process and share your personal data, including information on your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications. Our services are intended for corporate subscribers and you warrant that the email address submitted is your corporate email address.