View all newsletters
Receive our newsletter - data, insights and analysis delivered to you
  1. Technology
May 23, 2012

EU gives Google weeks time to address antitrust concerns

Commission would finalise a remedies package if Google proposes solutions

By CBR Staff Writer

The European Commission (EC) anti-trust officials have said that internet search giant, Google may have misused its dominance online to kill competition and offered the company a ‘matter of weeks’ to settle the allegations to avoid formal charges.

EC had written to Google Chairman Eric Schmidt regarding the EC’s concerns, after a lengthy investigation.

The Commission noted that it will initiate the discussions to finalise a remedies package if Google proposes an outline of remedies which can address the concerns.

EC vice president Joaquin Almunia said this would allow to solve concerns by means of a commitment decision – pursuant to Article 9 of the EU Antitrust Regulation – instead of having to pursue formal proceedings with a Statement of objections and to adopt a decision imposing fines and remedies.

"Any final proposal by Google will be market-tested before it is made legally binding by the Commission," he added.

"Should this process fail to deliver a satisfactory set of remedies, the on-going formal proceedings will of course continue, including the possible sending of a Statement of Objections."

Among the four areas listed, the first relates to its general search results on the web, where Google displays links to its own vertical search services, specialised search engines which focus on specific topics, such as news or products.

Content from our partners
Unlocking growth through hybrid cloud: 5 key takeaways
How businesses can safeguard themselves on the cyber frontline
How hackers’ tactics are evolving in an increasingly complex landscape

In its general search results, Google displays links to its own vertical search services differently than it does for links to competitors, which the Commission says is concerning as this may result in preferential treatment and hurt competing services.

The second is about the way Google copies content from competing vertical search services and uses it in its own offerings.

Third, relates to Google’s deals with partners on the websites of which the company delivers search advertisements and the fourth centers on restrictions that Google puts to the portability of online search advertising campaigns from its platform AdWords to the platforms of competitors.

The case stems after the Commission launched an antitrust investigation in November 2010 following a number of complaints from Google’s competitors that the search engine giant had abused a dominant market position in the online search market.

Websites in our network
Select and enter your corporate email address Tech Monitor's research, insight and analysis examines the frontiers of digital transformation to help tech leaders navigate the future. Our Changelog newsletter delivers our best work to your inbox every week.
  • CIO
  • CTO
  • CISO
  • CSO
  • CFO
  • CDO
  • CEO
  • Architect Founder
  • MD
  • Director
  • Manager
  • Other
Visit our privacy policy for more information about our services, how New Statesman Media Group may use, process and share your personal data, including information on your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications. Our services are intended for corporate subscribers and you warrant that the email address submitted is your corporate email address.
THANK YOU