View all newsletters
Receive our newsletter - data, insights and analysis delivered to you
  1. Technology
  2. Data
November 27, 2012

Printing error leads to £60,000 fine for Plymouth council

Council did not have adequate procedures in place to safeguard printing process, investigation found

By Steve Evans


The Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) has slapped Plymouth City Council with a £60,000 fine after details of a child neglect case were sent to the wrong person.

According to the ICO’s investigation, a social worker at the council sent a document containing sensitive information to a printer on a different floor. Another social worker at the council picked up three pages of the report when collecting another document from the same printer.

The pages were then sent to another family, unconnected to the child neglect case.

The report contained highly sensitive information about two adults and their four children, the ICO said.

The family that mistakenly received the three pages telephoned the council to report the error. The ICO said the document was revered within two hours. However the investigation also revealed that the family who received the report contacted the family at the centre of the child neglect case via a social network.

An independent audit found the system in place at the council, "did not incorporate an adequate level of checks in order to ensure the documents were being sent to the correct recipient." The report said there was a high risk of a similar incident happening again if changes were not made.

As a result of this the council has implemented a new system whereby all staff from the Children’s Services department are required to enter a user ID before printing documents. Any document not printed after 12 hours is deleted from the queue.

Content from our partners
Unlocking growth through hybrid cloud: 5 key takeaways
How businesses can safeguard themselves on the cyber frontline
How hackers’ tactics are evolving in an increasingly complex landscape

"It would be too easy to consider this a simple human error. The reality is that this incident happened because not enough care was being taken within the organisation when handling vulnerable people’s sensitive information," said Stephen Eckersley, Head of Enforcement at the ICO.

"The distress this incident will have caused the people involved is obvious, and the penalty we have issued today reflects that," he added.

Websites in our network
Select and enter your corporate email address Tech Monitor's research, insight and analysis examines the frontiers of digital transformation to help tech leaders navigate the future. Our Changelog newsletter delivers our best work to your inbox every week.
  • CIO
  • CTO
  • CISO
  • CSO
  • CFO
  • CDO
  • CEO
  • Architect Founder
  • MD
  • Director
  • Manager
  • Other
Visit our privacy policy for more information about our services, how New Statesman Media Group may use, process and share your personal data, including information on your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications. Our services are intended for corporate subscribers and you warrant that the email address submitted is your corporate email address.
THANK YOU