View all newsletters
Receive our newsletter - data, insights and analysis delivered to you
  1. Technology
  2. Networks
August 22, 2014

User entitlement on Twitter is far worse than you think

Or why nobody knows who owns the Internet.

By Cbr Rolling Blog

It’s been said that people value your product as you price it. But the reaction to Twitter’s decision to insert popular tweets into feeds shows that user entitlement works the opposite way: the less you pay, the more you’ll kick off when someone changes things.

Vlad Savov, a hack from consumer tech site the Verge, managed to capture the possessiveness in his blog on the subject: "Just scan through some of the other unhappy reactions about Twitter’s latest changes: they speak of ‘my’ timeline and ‘my’ feed, reiterating that sense of attachment between the user and the service."

As technology evolves it is common to assert a continuity between old and new, but events like this remind us why social media is not a straight replacement for the postal service. While you had to pay for the materials to create a letter, there was never any question of who the missive belonged to – postmen were couriers, not content aggregators.

Now nobody is sure who owns what, and website owners are not entirely sure how they are supposed to make money out of this monster. By not charging you for their ostensible service Facebook, Twitter and the rest are having to make up the cash by irritating you with things you’d rather not see.

This is not to say people are eager to start paying for services. As CBR reported earlier this week, 98% of users would not pay a mere £140 a year to make the adverts stop. But given that two thirds of users were skipping video ads as quickly as possible, it’s fair to say that they were none too appreciative of paying with their time either.

The strange fact is that while consumers believe they own the Internet, all the stuff we like is controlled by big companies. While the internet feels like it is free, somebody is always paying, whether it’s the ad companies, the service providers, or the customer with their time.

For the most part this does not matter, and we all shuffle along happily. But the hostility to the changes on Twitter, the Facebook experiment, or even John McAfee’s comments regarding privacy show some of the restrictions placed on companies by this attitude.

Content from our partners
Unlocking growth through hybrid cloud: 5 key takeaways
How businesses can safeguard themselves on the cyber frontline
How hackers’ tactics are evolving in an increasingly complex landscape

Silicon Valley tells the customer he is king. Unfortunately, the customer agrees.

Websites in our network
Select and enter your corporate email address Tech Monitor's research, insight and analysis examines the frontiers of digital transformation to help tech leaders navigate the future. Our Changelog newsletter delivers our best work to your inbox every week.
  • CIO
  • CTO
  • CISO
  • CSO
  • CFO
  • CDO
  • CEO
  • Architect Founder
  • MD
  • Director
  • Manager
  • Other
Visit our privacy policy for more information about our services, how New Statesman Media Group may use, process and share your personal data, including information on your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications. Our services are intended for corporate subscribers and you warrant that the email address submitted is your corporate email address.
THANK YOU