The UK government has unveiled plans to modernise public services through advanced technology and AI. At the centre of the initiative is “Humphrey,” a suite of AI tools intended to streamline civil service operations, improve efficiency, and reduce costs. The plan, led by the Department for Science, Innovation and Technology (DSIT), is being presented as a step towards a more responsive government system.
The initiative seeks to address inefficiencies in public sector operations, with current systems relying on outdated processes. For instance, HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) reportedly manages 100,000 calls daily, while the Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency (DVLA) processes 45,000 letters. The government claims the new strategy will reduce these burdens by eliminating tasks such as registering deaths in person at council offices or posting newspaper notices for certain licences.
“My department will put AI to work, speeding up our ability to deliver our Plan for Change, improve lives and drive growth,” said Technology Secretary Peter Kyle. “We will use technology to bear down hard on the nonsensical approach the public sector takes to sharing information and working together to help the people it serves.”
Addressing public sector inefficiencies
“Humphrey,” named after the fictional civil servant from the BBC series ‘Yes, Minister’, is being introduced to assist with routine civil service tasks. Key components include “Consult,” which analyses public consultation responses within hours, and “Minute,” an AI transcription service for government meetings. Additional tools such as “Parlex,” “Redbox,” and “Lex” are designed to support functions like analysing parliamentary debates, conducting legal research, and preparing policy briefs.
The government asserts that these tools will reduce dependence on costly external consultants, accelerate response times, and streamline policymaking processes. While questions remain about the scalability of these tools in a public sector that has historically faced challenges in implementing large-scale technology projects, the Tony Blair Institute’s Director of Government Innovation Alexander Iosad welcomed today’s announcements.
“We are currently operating on a model of public services unfit for the 21st century,” said Iosad. “It is a waste of people’s time to provide the same information over and over to get a simple answer when we could ask for it once and mandate departments to securely share it with each other. And it is wrong for people to spend months waiting for vital decisions on benefits and support when the technology needed to clear the backlogs already exists. Through these changes, we can move from a model of public services built on delays and disappointment, to one of delivery.”
DSIT has also announced plans to reform how technology is deployed and funded across government departments. Proposed measures include the mandatory publication of application programming interfaces (APIs) to facilitate secure data sharing and the establishment of a Technical Design Council to address implementation challenges. The creation of a Responsible AI Advisory Panel is also planned to oversee ethical considerations, though the effectiveness of these governance mechanisms will depend on execution.
The plan outlines efforts to centralise procurement through a Digital Commercial Centre of Excellence, enabling public sector organisations to negotiate contracts collectively. This is expected to lower costs and open opportunities for UK-based technology firms.
The announcement builds on the government’s AI Opportunities Action Plan, which claims to have attracted £14bn in investment. While the government positions itself as an emerging AI leader, questions persist about whether the proposed measures can overcome entrenched inefficiencies and deliver on their promises.
Initial pilot programmes are expected to begin later this year, targeting services for individuals with long-term health conditions or disabilities. These groups currently navigate complex interactions with multiple public sector organisations, highlighting the need for streamlined access to services.
The government has projected potential annual savings of £45bn through productivity gains. However, the realisation of these savings is uncertain, given the track record of delays and cost overruns in past digital transformation efforts. Critics point to the importance of transparency and accountability in ensuring this initiative does not replicate previous shortcomings.
Although Labour previously cancelled £1.3bn in AI funding pledged by the previous government, Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer’s AI Opportunities Action Plan acknowledges AI’s role in driving economic growth. However, the plan has drawn criticism for its limited support for British AI startups, which Ecomtent’s Max Sinclair argued to Tech Monitor were essential for the UK’s future leadership in the sector. While the plan promotes initiatives like supercomputers, growth zones, and a National Data Library, its focus appears to favour large tech companies over fostering the innovation and agility of homegrown startups.
Read more: US FTC report warns AI partnerships could undermine competition
